(concluding part)
Common Threads - SET VII : the 'right' picot join
As beginners some of our first
shuttle-only flowers and butterflies have free rings – a cluster of closely
tatted outward facing rings. The next stage is when the adjacent petals are
linked through picots and we learn the picot join. Easy - the joining picot is to the left of current work. And then comes the last petal/ring (7th ring in fig2) and we have to join it to the first ring. Huh! How to link it to the first petal?! How to reach
through that picot without ending up with a twist or with a locked/snagged core
thread?
Common Threads - SET VII : the 'right' picot join
Picot Join to the
Right – Part 3
Terminology & Range
Terminology & Range
fig 1 - projects with the 'right' picot join |
fig 2 - rosette |
There are many ways, and just as many terms,
but the core principle/factor remains the same –
but the core principle/factor remains the same –
the linking picot is to the right of the element being worked.
fig 3 - more projects with picot join to the right |
Last to First Join refers to this aspect – the last
element linked back to the first element through a picot. It can be between 2
rings, 2 chains or a ring and chain.
Most frequently we
apply this linkage to close a medallion in a circle.
Joining in a circle/in the round is another term for
this final linkage arising from traditional medallions before the invention of the
tatted chain. Medallions made of a cluster of linked outward facing rings were
commonly called a rosette or flower (fig2). Hence Mary Konior also called it the Rosette Join.
As frequently mentioned, it is not
just difficult to reach that joining picot, but there is a tendency for it to
twist after linkage has been made. The following terms are based on the
movement required to make that linkage.
Twisted picot join – where the picot is pre-twisted
before pulling a loop through it for linkage, thus pre-empting or neutralizing
the twist when completed.
Folded Join – where the work is folded in such a way as to
reach that ‘pesky’ picot.
Avoiding the Folded Join – a simple reorientation or
rotation of work results in avoiding any folding or twisting by bringing the
linking picot to the left of work.
Riego Join is yet another term (coined by Teri Dusenbury) referring
to the same join found in Mlle Riego’s books dating back to the 2nd
half of 19th century. A long tail is cut, slipped through the
picots, and the last ring is finger-tatted. Thus the linkage is made Before the
ring is tatted.
The above list seems to suggest a fairly small range where this join to the right comes into play.
Not true! The
following tatted models show us numerous circumstances where we have used the ‘right’ picot join.
And to make it playful, try identifying that join to the right in each medallion or motif (click on image for larger view or on blue link for respective post).
Does it have to be a circle?
And to make it playful, try identifying that join to the right in each medallion or motif (click on image for larger view or on blue link for respective post).
Does it have to be a circle?
Let us not take the ‘circle/round’
term too literally. It largely refers to closing/linking back to the start, not
the shape. Shape is determined by the elements.(eg. the triangle in fig1. The 5-ringed flowers in this
bouquet give a definite pentagonal outline. The 4 rings in the center of the cross clearly form a square or diamond, acting as a scaffolding. (figs 4 & 5)
Only single or a cluster of rings?
Rosettes have very closely placed single rings. However, a larger, more open medallion, or an edging, when joined back on itself, may need the same join.
And not just single rings, but a cluster of 2 or more rings can be joined back. eg. the pair of rings in Butterfly Squares/Edging (fig6) or the last ring in a clover or trefoil (fig7)
Rosettes have very closely placed single rings. However, a larger, more open medallion, or an edging, when joined back on itself, may need the same join.
And not just single rings, but a cluster of 2 or more rings can be joined back. eg. the pair of rings in Butterfly Squares/Edging (fig6) or the last ring in a clover or trefoil (fig7)
Does the join come into play only with outward facing rings?
Not at all, though most resources tend to focus on rosettes. The following examples have inward facing rings, but need to join the last ring to the first through the picot that is on the right of current work (fig8). In the Clover Wreath Poinsettia there are inward facing clovers. Last 2 rings need to be joined to the first 2 rings. But the last green ring on the final chain is also linked in same manner! (fig9)
Not just single, but multiple rings can need the join! And not just one but more linking picots within the same element may be involved.
The vintage edging with bare thread space has both inward and outward facing rings and since it is closed, the starting rings were on the right of the final rings (fig10). In the Quatrefoil medallions the number of inner rings reflect the overall shape of the polygon and the rings are bridged by split rings (ie. we move from one inner ring to the next via a split ring instead of bare thread or chain).
Does the join occur only between
rings?
In this medallion, the linkage
takes place between the inner yellow rings as well as the first and last blue chains (fig12).
Again, there may be multiple
linkages. Can you identify the ring-to-ring and the ring-to-chain links in the Classic square (fig13) ; Or the final chain-to-chain link in the snowflake? (fig14)
Layered and 3D formations
Why stop at only 2D tatting?
Tatting around a button, cabochon, gem, shell, doodad, may all end up with a
last picot join to the right.
Whether around a button, or around a gem for a ring, the final inward facing ring clearly needs to be joined back. The popular Ice Drops require
the join both on the front and back. And even the final curled ring is
linked back around the shell. (fig15). In the ANKAR-style earring not just the large blue rings, but the curled rings also need the picot
join to their right (fig16).
Is it always the final/last join?
Again, No.
In both the part 1 & part 2 pictorials,
as in majority of tutorials, the thread(s) end up at the front/above the work.
It does not matter as usually the work is ending and after the threads are snipped off, the tails can be repositioned as desired.
But there are patterns where one may need to continue further and hence both threads need to be on the same side - either at back of work or in front - as in the Curly Cross pendant (fig5) or this 3D flower (fig17).
But there are patterns where one may need to continue further and hence both threads need to be on the same side - either at back of work or in front - as in the Curly Cross pendant (fig5) or this 3D flower (fig17).
In the one-pass snowflake,
‘Celeste’ (fig18), each arm has rings that need to be linked to their right, and work
continues! So ‘last to first’ is no longer applicable!
I
hope these projects provide a glimpse into the diverse usage of the join to the
right, and why a generic term like ‘picot join to the right’ is more applicable
than the smaller windows provided by other terms. Nevertheless, whatever term
(or movement) is used, one should now be able to identify with ease, where and
when the ‘right’ picot join is required. No more scratching one's head even if the pattern instructions do not specify it !!!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBetter get to grips with it then!
ReplyDeleteGreat post!
ReplyDeleteInteresting post
ReplyDeleteGreat information!! :)
ReplyDeleteThank you so much Jane, Ninetta, Margaret & Sue for your support and appreciation :-))))
ReplyDeleteUnknown, I was going to agree with you when I read your comment ;-D